ArticleERJ open research2025
Poor clinical outcomes in respiratory viral sepsis: a retrospective observational study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory viral sepsis: rethinking fluid resuscitation and antibiotic stewardship.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Differences in the Phenotype of Bacterial and Viral Sepsis-A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.Viruses · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study attempts to explore the clinical differences of sepsis caused by respiratory viruses and bacteria, and to search for risk factors for mortality in viral sepsis. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients hospitalised at our medical intensive care unit (ICU) from October 2020 to January 2024 who were diagnosed with pneumonia and sepsis. The primary and secondary pathogens were identified with comprehensive aetiological tests. The baseline clinical information, biochemical tests, treatments and clinical outcomes were collected. Results: This study included 292 patients, comprising 191 with viral sepsis and 101 with bacterial sepsis. Compared with the bacterial sepsis group, patients with respiratory viral sepsis had lower oxygenation index levels upon ICU admission, higher proportions of acute respiratory distress syndrome (85% Conclusions: ICU patients with respiratory viral sepsis presented a higher incidence of unfavourable outcome, which may partially be attributed to secondary infections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.