ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Recent Advances in the Delivery of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Targeting Glioma: An Updated Review.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins might be the most prospective in glioma treatment because of the facts that they can differentiate glioma cells, inhibit tumor growth and manage glioma stem cells. Its clinical application is hindered by several challenges, including limited permeability across the blood-brain barrier, which impedes effective delivery to the central nervous system; high susceptibility to enzymatic degradation, which compromises stability and therapeutic efficacy; and nonselective binding, which reduces specificity and may result in unintended off-target effects. This review systematically covers the advanced BMP delivery systems such as nanoparticles, smart carriers, gene therapy, and exosome-based system. Hydrogels, scaffolds, and microspheres' local delivery methods are also discussed as prospective options. The in vitro studies reveal that BMPs are effective and using in vivo glioma models there is also evidence of the effectiveness of BMPs. In addition, new clinical trials reveal concern with safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effects of BMPs, especially their combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. BMP specificity and therapeutic performance are further optimized by Personalized medicine and CRISPR/Cas engineering. However, regulatory barriers and product commercialization are challenging issues. This review highlights the need for novel approaches and advanced technologies to address the challenges associated with BMP delivery, aiming to establish BMP-based therapies as an effective treatment strategy for glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.