ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Formulation, in silico, in vitro characterization, cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of cyclodextrin complexes and ion pairing/salt formation with functional excipients (azelaic acid, tartaric acid, and arginine) with raloxifene.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication of vitamin BInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Modulation of Drug Release in Anticancer Therapy: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Emerging Drug Delivery Platforms.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With advancements in drug repurposing, the search for effective and less harmful anticancer agents remains a critical endeavor. Raloxifene, although not a typical anticancer drug, holds promise in this context. However, its poor solubility poses a significant challenge to its therapeutic potential and formulation efficiency. Functional excipients such as cyclodextrins (e.g., β-cyclodextrin, hydroxy propyl β-cyclodextrin, and Captisol) and pH-modifying excipients (e.g., tartaric acid, azelaic acid, and arginine) were investigated to enhance solubility, dissolution, cytotoxicity and cellular uptakes employing Caco-2 cell lines through binary solid dispersions. In silico studies suggested the potential for salt formation with raloxifene-azelaic acid and raloxifene-tartaric acid, as well as inclusion complexes with cyclodextrins. Experimental results showed that pH-modifying excipients, particularly tartaric and azelaic acids, significantly improved solubility (up to an 800-fold increase), outperforming cyclodextrins (8-fold increase) compared to the untreated drug. Cytotoxicity studies on the human breast cancer (Michigan cancer foundation, MCF-7) cells revealed that raloxifene-tartaric acid significantly enhanced cell killing, achieving efficacy comparable to the standard anticancer drug Taxol. Additionally, both fluorescence-labeled raloxifene: hydroxy propyl β-cyclodextrin coprecipitated mixtures (Coppt) and raloxifene: tartaric acid Coppt exhibited concentration- and time-dependent cellular uptake, with mean fluorescence intensity increasing significantly at 24 h, indicating rapid internalization and sustained intracellular retention, especially at higher concentrations. More interestingly, the superior cellular uptake was in favor of the latter, indicating the pH-modifying excipient tartaric acid, and these findings correlated well with solubility and dissolution studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.