ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Pregnancy stress in women at high risk of preeclampsia with their anxiety, depression, self-management capacity: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early psycho-social support of pregnant women at risk for preeclampsia and fetal intrauterine growth restriction.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Clinical, social, and occupational determinants of severe preeclampsia: a multifactorial case-control study on maternal health inequities in Peru.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Associations between physical activity and prenatal depression and anxiety symptoms: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many studies suggest that psychological factors are intrinsically connected to the onset of preeclampsia. However, there are no relevant surveys on the psychological situation of this population. The aims of our study were to investigating the causes and prevalence of pregnancy stress in individuals at high risk of preeclampsia; exploring the correlation between pregnancy stress and anxiety, depression, and self-management capacity in this group. Our study provided evidence for the development of effective clinical management strategies and related psychological care for women at high risk of preeclampsia. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on women at high risk of preeclampsia who came to Jiangnan University Hospital's obstetrics outpatient clinic for antenatal care. Sociodemographic and obstetric-related characteristics, Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale (PSRS), Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS), Self-rating Questionnaire of Healthcare Management for Pregnancy (SQHMP) were included in this study. Data analysis covered descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: A total of 138 pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia were enrolled in the study. Univariate analysis showed significant relationships between intergenerational relations (with mothers-in-law), pregnancy intention, and desired mode of delivery among pregnancy stress ( Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need to focus on pregnancy stress in women at high risk of preeclampsia, especially those have presented higher levels of anxiety, depression, and self-management capacity. Based on these variables, healthcare professionals should increase screening for mental health in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia as well as provide additional psychological care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.