Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

"Inconsistency between words and deeds": a meta-analysis of the moderating and mediating mechanisms of bridging the exercise-intentional-behavior gap.

Zexin Yang, Jun Li, Xiaoming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zexin YangSchool of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China.
Jun LiSchool of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China.
Xiaoming LiuSchool of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise intention is a crucial predictor of exercise behavior; however, the existence of the "intention-behavior gap" is an undeniable fact, and the strength and mechanisms of their relationship remain controversial. This study, based on 92 empirical studies (109 independent samples, 47,548 participants), employs meta-analysis to examine the relationship strength between exercise intention and behavior, the moderating effects of participant characteristics, and the mediating role of planning and action control. The findings are as follows: (1) the relationship strength between exercise intention and behavior is moderate (

Indexed as

BCTexercise behaviorexercise intentionintention-behavior gapmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID40470022
PMCPMC12133765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.