ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Cognitive constraints in bilingual processing-an entropy-based discrimination between translation and second language production.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates to what extent second language production (L2) and translational production are influenced by cognitive constraints due to their bilingual processing. Compared with monolingual production in first language (L1), the two bilingual productions are subject to the same cognitive constraints due to the co-activation of two linguistic systems and the language contact interference, though they involve two distinctive conceptualization stages, which may cause variations to their cognitive constraint. Entropy is utilized as an indicator of cognitive constraints in the study to illuminate how bilingual processing causes cognitive constraints to the two bilingual productions. Specifically, word and part-of-speech n-gram features are computed in the machine learning models to compare the three productions. The results show that L1 production could be effectively distinguished with the two bilingual productions, with L1 production exhibiting greater diversity and a more even distribution in most features than L2 production and translational production. This is clear evidence that both L2 production and translational production endure more cognitive load in the bilingual processing than L1 production. The results also reveal that L2 production and translational production could be discriminated against each other, with the former one exhibiting greater diversity and a more even distribution in most features than the latter one. These findings support the idea that both translators and L2 users belong to bilinguals affected by the cognitive load in bilingual processing although the two bilingual productions are constrained differently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.