SynthesisGMS journal for medical education2025
Undergraduate ophthalmology education according to International Council of Ophthalmology guidelines: A systematic review.
Synthesis in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A combined PBL and flipped classroom intervention enhances self-directed learning ability and empathy in ophthalmology undergraduates.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ophthalmology education and systemic disease integration in Syrian medical schools: a cross-sectional assessment of knowledge gaps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Together! Clinic, research and teaching in human medicine, nursing, veterinary medicine and psychology: interdisciplinary, interprofessional, transhierarchical.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The research focused on the recommendations of the International Council of Ophthalmology, specifically regarding the duration of ophthalmology education, areas of clinical exposure, essential skills, and adherence to these standards internationally. Methodology: A thorough search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ERIC databases up to April 2024 to identify studies related to International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) principles in undergraduate medical education. Two independent reviewers assessed citations for inclusion criteria, gathered data, and evaluated the risk of bias using the ROBIN-I tool, PROSPERO CRD42024517718. Findings: From 537 unique references, only eight research articles qualified for inclusion. The primary educational aim in most studies was to meet the ICO requirements. Typically, medical students spend at least two weeks focusing on ophthalmology. These courses offer extensive exposure to ophthalmic patients across diverse clinical environments, such as ophthalmology clinics, emergency departments, and surgical theaters. Instructional methods include theoretical lectures, small group discussions, self-directed learning, and hands-on clinical experiences. The study found that the adoption of ICO recommendations varied from 20% to 36%. Conclusions: This research evaluates how undergraduate ophthalmology education in medical schools correlates with ICO guidelines, indicating that implementation remains limited. Enhanced promotion of these standards in educational institutions is essential, alongside further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.