ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
The role of radiotherapy in the management of metastatic rectal cancer: A narrative review on the opportunities for non-operative management and organ preservation.
Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of dose escalation in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer on clinical and pathologic Response: A Systematic review andClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 20% of patients with rectal cancer present with metastatic rectal cancer (MRC). The 5-year relative survival for patients with MRC is about 15%. With emerging systemic therapies, including more effective chemotherapy regimens, immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and radiotherapy as a local option, more patients with advanced rectal cancer are achieving complete clinical response in the primary tumor. Consequently, non-operative management (NOM) through a "watch and wait approach" is becoming increasingly desired. Additionally, improved biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can improve accuracy in predicting responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and monitoring recurrence after achieving complete clinical response. In this narrative review, we examine the current evidence on the role of radiotherapy in the management of MRC, with a focus on NOM and organ preservation strategies. Notably, although several investigations have evaluated various aspects of the NOM approach, there is still limited data regarding patient satisfaction and quality of life. The improved quality of life may be a key factor driving patient preference for NOM, and we also emphasize the data on the impact of NOM on patient's quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.