Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469929›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025

Patient Preference on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Atsuko Kawasaki, Miho Yuki, Shizuka Nakagawa, Keisuke Iwasaki, Haruka Ochi, Yasuo Sugitani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atsuko Kawasaki *Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-9246-8917
Miho Yuki *Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Shizuka Nakagawa *Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke Iwasaki *Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka Ochi *Speciality Clinical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo Sugitani *Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2291-0323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patient preference is important in decision-making processes, such as drug approval and price determination. We conducted a systematic review regarding the preference of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment. Patients and Methods: We searched for articles on patient preferences for AMD treatment published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2023 using EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and PLOS. Results: Seven studies were included in this systematic review. Conjoint analysis was used in all seven trials, of which six were Discrete Choice Experiments and one was a ranking. These studies were conducted in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, and Singapore. Six studies focused on patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD, also called wet AMD, ie, wAMD), and one focused on patients with nAMD or diabetic macular edema. The attributes of the treatments used in these seven studies were efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost. Overall, the relative importance of attributes related to efficacy and safety were the highest, followed by those related to convenience and costs. The convenience and cost attributes were almost equal. Conclusion: Although the definitions of treatment attributes differed among the studies, patients with nAMD considered efficacy and safety to be the most important. The results of several studies suggest that patient preferences may be affected by patient demographics, such as sex. Although there are currently only a few preference studies on patients with AMD, it is necessary to continue conducting studies to understand the trends in patient preferences according to patient demographics.

Indexed as

discrete choice experimentnAMDpatient preferencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40469929
PMCPMC12135951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.