ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
12-Month trajectories of physical and mental symptom scores after COVID-19 hospitalization and their role in predicting "very long" COVID.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long COVID syndrome (LCS) represents a significant global health challenge due to its wide-ranging physical and cognitive symptoms that persist beyond 12 months in a substantial proportion of individuals recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Developing tools for predicting long-term LCS persistence can improve patient management and resource allocation. Objective: To evaluate the natural dynamics of symptoms over 12 months following hospitalization for COVID-19 and to establish the utility of survey-based symptoms assessment for predicting LCS at one year. Methods: This prospective observational study included 166 hospitalized COVID-19 survivors who were evaluated pre-discharge and followed up at 1, 3, and 12 months. Assessments included surveys including physical and mental symptom scales (e.g., EFTER-COVID, SBQ-LC, PCFS, MRC Dyspnea, CAT, CCQ, and HADS) and machine learning modeling to predict LCS persistence at 12 months. Results: LCS symptoms were reported by 76% of patients at three months and 43% at 12 months. Physical symptom scores, particularly EFTER-COVID and PCFS, consistently differentiated LCS and LCS-free cohorts. CAT outperformed other respiratory scales in its discriminatory ability, while HADS subscales showed limited predictive value. Younger patients (<40 years) demonstrated faster recovery, whereas older patients (>60 years) exhibited persistent symptoms across respiratory and cognitive domains. A machine learning model combining EFTER-COVID, SBQ-LC, CAT, and MRC Dyspnea scores achieved 91% predictive accuracy for LCS persistence at 12 months. Conclusion: Comprehensive survey-based symptoms assessment at three months post-discharge provides a practical and cost-effective tool for prediction of the long COVID persistence at 12 months, supporting targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.