Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469905›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025

Genetic and functional characterization of inherited complex chromosomal rearrangements in a family with multisystem anomalies.

He Fang, Stephen M Eacker, Yu Wu, Whitney Neufeld-Kaiser, Mercy Laurino, Siobán Keel, Marshall S Horwitz, Yajuan J Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He FangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
Stephen M EackerPhase Genomics, Seattle WA.
Yu WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
Whitney Neufeld-KaiserDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
Mercy LaurinoDepartment of Genetics and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Siobán KeelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
Marshall S HorwitzDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.
Yajuan J LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA.

Funding

A next-generation method for cytogenomics using Hi-C proximity ligation sequencingR44HD104323 · NICHD · PHASE GENOMICS, INC. · PI EACKER, STEPHEN MATTHEW · 2020 to 2022
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD104323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare structural variants involving 3 or more chromosomal breakpoints. Most de novo-reported CCRs pose challenges for diagnosis and management. They often require karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for clinical diagnosis because of the limitations of each method. Here, we report an inherited, exceptionally complex CCR involving 4 chromosomes and 13 breakpoints in a family with multisystem anomalies. Methods: We evaluated the CCRs using karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, CMA, and 2 emerging genomic technologies: high-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing aka genomic proximity mapping and optical genome mapping. We also performed functional studies using transcriptome and methylome analyses. Results: The proband, who had intellectual disability and immune deficiency, shared CCRs with her unaffected mother involving chromosomes 1, 7, and 11 by karyotyping. However, CMA revealed a duplication and 3 deletions in the proband, in contrast to her mother's balanced genome. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing aka genomic proximity mapping and optical genome mapping detected the CCRs and copy-number alterations but also uncovered additional breakpoints at high resolution, including an insertion in 4p and 2 cryptic rearrangements at 7p. Transcriptome and methylome analyses identified likely biological pathways associated with the proband's phenotypes. Conclusion: Combining cytogenetic and genomic methods provided comprehensive characterization and defined the breakpoints at high resolution in both proband and mother. This underscores the value of novel cytogenetic and genomic techniques in deciphering complex genome rearrangements and the significance of integrative genomic analysis and functional characterization in understanding clinical phenotypes.

Indexed as

Complex chromosomal rearrangementsGenomic proximity mapping (GPM)Hi-COptical genome mapping (OGM)

Identifiers

PMID40469905
PMCPMC12136847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.