ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
Genetic and functional characterization of inherited complex chromosomal rearrangements in a family with multisystem anomalies.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of acute myeloid leukemia using genomic proximity mapping-based next generation cytogenomics.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare structural variants involving 3 or more chromosomal breakpoints. Most de novo-reported CCRs pose challenges for diagnosis and management. They often require karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for clinical diagnosis because of the limitations of each method. Here, we report an inherited, exceptionally complex CCR involving 4 chromosomes and 13 breakpoints in a family with multisystem anomalies. Methods: We evaluated the CCRs using karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, CMA, and 2 emerging genomic technologies: high-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing aka genomic proximity mapping and optical genome mapping. We also performed functional studies using transcriptome and methylome analyses. Results: The proband, who had intellectual disability and immune deficiency, shared CCRs with her unaffected mother involving chromosomes 1, 7, and 11 by karyotyping. However, CMA revealed a duplication and 3 deletions in the proband, in contrast to her mother's balanced genome. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing aka genomic proximity mapping and optical genome mapping detected the CCRs and copy-number alterations but also uncovered additional breakpoints at high resolution, including an insertion in 4p and 2 cryptic rearrangements at 7p. Transcriptome and methylome analyses identified likely biological pathways associated with the proband's phenotypes. Conclusion: Combining cytogenetic and genomic methods provided comprehensive characterization and defined the breakpoints at high resolution in both proband and mother. This underscores the value of novel cytogenetic and genomic techniques in deciphering complex genome rearrangements and the significance of integrative genomic analysis and functional characterization in understanding clinical phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.