Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469898›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Onset of End-Stage Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration as an End Point-A Delphi Study: Classification of Atrophy Meetings Report 7.

Zhichao Wu, Srinivas R Sadda, Thomas Ach, Barbara A Blodi, Ferdinando Bottoni, Usha Chakravarthy, Emily Y Chew, Christine A Curcio, Frederick L Ferris, Monika Fleckenstein and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Zhichao WuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Srinivas R SaddaDoheny Image Reading and Research Laboratory, Doheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, California.
Thomas AchDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Barbara A BlodiWisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ferdinando BottoniEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco", Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Usha ChakravarthyCenter for Public Health, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Emily Y ChewDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Christine A CurcioDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Frederick L FerrisOphthalmic Research Consultants, Waxhaw, North Carolina.
Monika FleckensteinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
K Bailey FreundVitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York.
Juan E GrunwaldDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Glenn J JaffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sandra LiakopoulosCologne Image Reading Center (CIRCL), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of Ophthalmology, Cologne, Germany.
Tock Han LimNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Jordi M MonésDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Sergio PagliariniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Daniel PauleikhoffDepartment of Ophthalmology, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Maximilian PfauDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Philip J RosenfeldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
David SarrafStein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Richard F SpaideVitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York.
Janet R SparrowDepartments of Ophthalmology and Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Giovanni StaurenghiEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco", Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Francesco ViolaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Bryan William Jones · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether consensus can be reached on the acceptability of end-stage atrophy onset as a clinical end point in early intervention trials of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and the criteria for defining such an end point. Design: A modified Delphi study. Participants: International panel of experts in AMD, retinal imaging, and histopathology that are part of the Classification of Atrophy Meetings group. Methods: A modified Delphi study was undertaken to determine if there is consensus on the acceptability of the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD as a clinical end point to evaluate early interventions and the criteria for defining such an end point. Two initial rounds of online surveys were conducted. Aggregate results and anonymized comments were provided after each round, followed by a face-to-face meeting before a final survey round was completed. Main Outcome Measures: Statements where consensus was reached, defined as ≥80% of responses within the 3-point bracket for agreement or disagreement based on a 9-point Likert rating scale, from a total of 33 statements included in the final round of the survey. Results: Consensus was reached for the statement that the onset of end-stage atrophic AMD was an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions (82% responses in agreement). Consensus was also reached for the statement that such an end point should be defined based on anatomical changes that have been previously shown in clinical studies to be associated with marked, but not necessarily complete, functional loss (95% responses in agreement). Consensus was nearly reached for the specific criterion that ≥90% of such atrophic AMD lesions should have ≥1 test location that was ≤10 decibels on 2 microperimetry tests (77% responses in agreement). Conclusions: There was expert group consensus that the onset of end-stage atrophy is an appropriate clinical end point to evaluate early interventions in AMD, and that such an end point should show evidence of marked functional loss in prior clinical studies. We believe these findings will help to define incident clinical end points that are acceptable to regulatory authorities. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationDelphiDrusenGeographic atrophyMicroperimetry

Identifiers

PMID40469898
PMCPMC12133686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.