ReviewCurrent research in toxicology2025
Evaluating fumonisin contamination in cattle feed: Impact on animal health, the agriculture industry and regulatory considerations.
Review in Current research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contamination of fumonisin in feeds from different regions of China.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2001, the US FDA released guidance levels (GLs) for fumonisin (FUM) in corn and corn by-products intended for human and animal consumption. Recent research challenges the conservatism of these GLs for ruminants, particularly for regions like the Texas High Plains, where blending permissions have been provoked, limiting the management of FUM contamination economically and maximization of corn availability for feedlots. This study evaluates whether scientific advancements since 2001 warrant a revision of these guidelines. Specifically, a 2020 study provides new data on cattle fed FUM concentrations up to 108.8 mg/kg, suggesting the current 60 mg/kg GL may be overly conservative. Using a combination of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.