Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469850›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Green skills gap-A way ahead.

Terence Cook, David Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Terence Cook *Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, School of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
David Elliott *Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, School of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study looks at what has been called the "skills gap" in the UK and the EU in key renewable energy and allied fields, factors that might slow the development of green energy technology. Within this emerging sector, new skills training is evidently going to be an urgent requirement. But, although there will be a need for new people coming into the industry to have the right skills, there will also be a need to upskill the current workforce. While the education system will play a role in increasing skills and raising awareness of green career paths, industry must also play a major role, for example via apprenticeship schemes and in-house training. Government can also help by providing support for training. Indeed, government strategic planning could include skill training requirements as a key factor in overall energy policy development. Moreover, this paper goes further and suggests that government should play a more strategic role, by formally requiring companies to provide the necessary training to be eligible for state funding of renewable projects. So, as well as looking at green skill gaps and their possible impacts, the paper also looks at the issues involved in trying to integrate green skills development into green energy expansion programmes, within the wider context of a "just transition", the adaptive capacity of regions and communities to meet the challenges of a changing energy sector in terms of the need for "leveling up" via social and economic policies to reduce local and regional economic inequalities.

Indexed as

energygreen skillsindustrial decarbonizationjust transitionsustainable employment

Identifiers

PMID40469850
PMCPMC12133838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.