ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Exploring the landscape of Parkinson's disease transcriptomics: a quantitative review of research progress and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Peripheral Blood Transcriptomic Profiles in Parkinson's Disease and Restless Legs Syndrome: An Exploratory Between-Cohort Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study leverages bibliometric analysis to uncover the research landscape and spotlight emerging trends in the field of Parkinson's disease (PD) transcriptomics. Methods: The relevant literature on Parkinson's disease and transcriptomics was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the Bibliometrix R package. Results: A total of 208 research articles were retrieved from January 2011 to March 2025. The number of publications has shown a steady increase, particularly from 2020 to 2024, with an average annual publication rate of 29 articles during this period. The United States and China were the leading countries in terms of publication counts, while the University of Luxembourg and McGill University were the top contributing institutions. The most impactful journals included "Nature Communications" and "NPJ Parkinson's Disease." The co-occurrence analysis of keywords revealed that "Parkinson's disease," "transcriptomics," "neurodegeneration," and "biomarkers" are current research hotspots. Citation burst analysis identified key references related to genetics, transcriptomics, and data analysis tools that have significantly influenced the field. Conclusion: This study offers the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Parkinson's disease (PD) transcriptomics research from 2011 to 2025. We reveal a significant surge in research activity, particularly since 2020, driven by advancements in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. The United States and China lead in publication output, with key contributions from the University of Luxembourg and McGill University. Research hotspots include neuroinflammation, biomarker discovery, and machine learning applications, indicating a shift toward translational research. However, challenges such as data heterogeneity and high biomarker validation failure rates persist. Future research should focus on standardizing methodologies and enhancing clinical relevance. Strategic directions include multi-omics integration, global collaboration, and linking transcriptomic signatures to clinical outcomes, aiming to improve early diagnosis and personalized therapies for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.