ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Formulation of Tooth Mousse Containing Grape Seed Extract and Comparative Evaluation of Its Remineralizing Effect with GC Tooth Mousse: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic infectious diseases, with its incidence increasing significantly over time. The global prevalence rate of dental caries in primary teeth stands at approximately 46.2% (Furiga et al.). To combat this widespread issue, remineralizing agents play a crucial role in reducing the prevalence rate, helping to restore and strengthen the demineralized tooth surface. Objectives: The aim of this Materials and methodology: The remineralizing property of a formulated GSE-containing tooth mousse was compared with the gold standard GC Tooth Mousse by checking the microhardness values in extracted teeth samples divided into two groups: group A, treated with the GSE-containing tooth mousse, and group B, treated with the standardized GC Tooth Mousse. Results: There was a significant difference in microhardness between the baseline and after remineralization within each group. In the intergroup comparison after remineralization, the microhardness of group A was significantly greater than that of group B. Conclusion: Both the commercially available GC Tooth Mousse and the formulated GSE-containing tooth mousse demonstrated good remineralizing potential, with the GSE-containing tooth mousse showing slightly better remineralizing potential compared to the commercially available GC Tooth Mousse. How to cite this article: Gujarathi AM, Shah P, Chaudhary S,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.