Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469814›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025

Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An

Kumari Neesu, Ashish Saxena, Shikhar P Chauhan, Neha Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kumari NeesuDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Autonomous College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ashish SaxenaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Autonomous College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shikhar P ChauhanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Autonomous College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neha VermaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and objectives: The study aimed to assess and compare the success of primary molars after restoration with modified atraumatic restorative treatment (mART) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) through the Hall technique (HT) on primary molars by clinical and radiographic examination, along with posttreatment behavioral assessment of patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Materials and methods: On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population aged 4-9 years was selected. A split-mouth study design was used. All the participants were divided into two groups: group I received mART as restorative treatment, and group II received SSCs as restorations. The FPS-R was used as a means of pain perception during the treatment, and it was assessed after the completion of both procedures. A follow-up at 3, 6, and 9 months was recorded. Results: A total of 11 participants had resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restorations in good condition, compared to 29 participants in group II who had restorations in perfect condition. However, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups, and the majority of participants in both groups pointed toward nagging face pain. Conclusion: The present study found a higher incidence of clinical and radiographic failures in the mART group. A viable restorative option for carious primary molars was found to be the HT, which is additionally convenient, child-friendly, and less invasive, despite causing mild postoperative discomfort. To a lesser extent, RMGIC restorations with partial excavation were also successful. Therefore, based on case selection, clinical judgment, and child cooperation, these minimally invasive approaches can be implemented. How to cite this article: Neesu K, Saxena A, Chauhan SP. Rationality of Efficacy of the Treatment Modalities-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Hall Technique by Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Parameters along with Posttreatment Behavioral Assessment of Patients through Face Pain Scale-Revised: An

Indexed as

Atraumatic restorative techniqueHall techniqueMinimal invasive dentistry

Identifiers

PMID40469814
PMCPMC12131049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.