Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469797›Full record

ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2025

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Screening in Primary Care Settings for Adults: A Systematic Review.

Betül Küçükardalı-Cansever, Angela Lamson, Natalia Sira, Stephanie Ann Bridgland, Sheena Eagan, Erin Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Association of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Betül Küçükardalı-CanseverDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mailstop 505 Greenville, Greenville, NC 27858 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-0308
Angela LamsonDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mailstop 505 Greenville, Greenville, NC 27858 USA.
Natalia SiraDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mailstop 505 Greenville, Greenville, NC 27858 USA.
Stephanie Ann BridglandDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC USA.
Sheena EaganDepartment of Bioethics and Interdisciplinary Studies, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC USA.
Erin RobertsDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mailstop 505 Greenville, Greenville, NC 27858 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial evidence links ACE scores with adult health complications, emphasizing the significance of enhanced detection, interpretation, and management of ACEs in primary care settings for adults. This systematic review aims to explore existing ACE screening and post-screening practices for adult patients in primary care settings worldwide via a thorough systematic review, including a search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Out of an initial 883 potential articles from two independent reviewers, 53 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the US (71.7%). Globally, 83% of the ACE screening studies indicated that ACES were screened specifically for research purposes, while the remaining 17% covered quality improvement, trauma-informed care interventions, and routine screenings in healthcare settings. This review delves into various intricacies of ACEs screening, the professional roles involved in the screening process, the location where the screening was conducted, prior training on ACEs for the screening implementers, and subsequent actions like interventions, referrals, and resource allocation. Despite growing awareness of the long-term effects of ACEs, a gap exists between ACEs research and related clinical practices in primary care. Additionally, there is no consensus on how to utilize ACEs screening in primary care and which ACE scores necessitate indicated interventions. Implications focus on the collaborative health use of ACEs screenings in primary care. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-025-00691-4.

Indexed as

ACEs screeningAdverse childhood experiencesBiopsychosocial healthPrimary careSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40469797
PMCPMC12129883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.