ReviewNational science review2025
Cutting-edge deep-learning based tools for metagenomic research.
Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- metaFun: An analysis pipeline for metagenomic big data with fast and unified functional searches.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Review
- Deciphering enzymatic potential in metagenomic reads through DNA language models.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- AIM: AI for microbiology.National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent years have seen incredible progress in the development of deep-learning (DL) tools for the analysis of biological data, with the most prominent example being AlphaFold2 for accurate protein structure prediction. DL-based tools are especially useful for identifying patterns and connections within sparsely labeled datasets. This makes them essential for the analysis of metagenomic data, which is mostly unannotated and bears little sequence similarity to known genes and proteins. In this review, we chose to present 12 tools which we deem as offering novel capabilities for metagenomic analysis by utilizing interesting DL techniques. This review is thus intended to be a solid starting point for any data scientist looking to apply advanced methods to explore metagenomic datasets. For each DL-based tool, we present its computational principles, followed by relevant examples of its application where possible and a note on its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.