Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Gut mycobiome maturation and its determinants during early childhood: a comparison of ITS2 amplicon and shotgun metagenomic sequencing approaches.

Timothy Heisel, Sara Gonia, Abrielle Dillon, Susan L Hoops, Gabriel A Al-Ghalith, Daryl Gohl, Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Karen Puopolo, Peter Kennedy, Michael J Sadowsky and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Yeasts in the gastrointestinal tract.FEMS yeast research · 2026
    Review
  4. Increased gutThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Timothy Heisel *Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Sara Gonia *Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Abrielle DillonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Susan L HoopsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Gabriel A Al-GhalithDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Daryl GohlDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Sagori MukhopadhyayChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Karen PuopoloChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Peter KennedyDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Michael J SadowskyDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Dan KnightsDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Abigail J JohnsonSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jeffrey S GerberChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Cheryl A GaleDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Microbial colonization of the gut in early life is important for the development of metabolism, immunity, and the brain. Fungi and bacteria both colonize the human infant gut. The relatively smaller contribution of fungi to the gut microbiome, as compared to bacteria, has posed technical challenges for the precise characterization of fungal communities (mycobiomes) and limited the ability to longitudinally examine mycobiome development. Background: The aims of this study were to (1) characterize mycobiome maturation and identify clinical determinants of mycobiome compositional variation during the first 2 years of life and (2) compare two sequencing approaches (ITS2 amplicon and whole genome metagenomics) for characterizing mycobiome maturational features. Longitudinal fecal samples and associated clinical metadata were obtained from subjects enrolled as part of the MAGIC (Microbiome, Antibiotics and Growth Infant Cohort) study. Results: Overall, fungal richness increased and mycobiome composition changed in a similar ordered pattern during the first 2 years of life utilizing either amplicon or metagenomic sequencing approaches. Less resolution of taxa to species and genera levels was observed for the metagenomic dataset. The predominant taxa identified by both sequencing approaches, Discussion: In summary, amplicon and metagenomic sequencing approaches provide generally similar results with respect to mycobiome maturational dynamics and the contribution of clinical variables to variation. Differences in taxa identification by the two approaches likely due to sequence database differences, primer/genome sequence variation, and/or sequencing depth should be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

childhoodgut mycobiomeITS2 ampliconlongitudinal variationwhole genome shotgun metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID40469735
PMCPMC12133761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.