ArticleCytoJournal2025
Comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology between larger and smaller size thyroid nodules.
Article in CytoJournal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thyroid nodules are frequently encountered in medical practice. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used to rule out malignant nodules, but few studies have questioned the accuracy of FNAC in larger thyroid nodules compared to smaller ones. We, therefore, aim to compare the diagnostic performance of FNAC based on nodule size and whether larger nodule size increases the possibility of obtaining indeterminate or non-diagnostic results. Material and Methods: Adult patients with thyroid nodules who underwent thyroid biopsy and surgery from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study. We assessed the proportion of benign, malignant, indeterminate, and non-diagnostic FNAC in relation to the nodule size. We then divided cytology into true positive (malignant FNAC and histology), and true negative (benign FNAC and histology) and examined whether the proportion of true FNAC would be affected by different thyroid nodule cutoffs. The study used mean and frequency to describe continuous and categorical variables. Results: Three hundred and forty-five patients were included in the study. The majority were female (86.7%) and older than 40 years. Half had a benign histology; the other 50% were malignant. The majority (49.3%) had indeterminate thyroid cytology. The proportion of indeterminate or non-diagnostic FNAC was the same (58%) in nodules ≥4 cm and <4 cm. The proportion of true FNAC was similar between different nodule size categories. It was 35% in ≥4 cm, and 34.3% in <4 cm nodules. Conclusion: The study found that the diagnostic performance of FNAC in thyroid nodules did not significantly differ based on nodule size, with similar rates of indeterminate or non-diagnostic results across different size categories. The proportion of true positive FNAC results also remained consistent regardless of nodule size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.