ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Integrating time in definitions of carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas removals and reversals.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating time in definitions of carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas removals and reversals.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The 10th anniversary of the Paris agreement on climate: unmet goals and unanswered questions.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The permanence or temporary nature of carbon removals from the atmosphere into natural systems has been a major topic of debate in the design of accounting methodologies for climate policy. These topics are currently being discussed in the preparation of a new mechanism established by the Paris Agreement. Emerging concepts from the field of ecosystem ecology could provide the key metrics needed to address the problems of permanence and reversibility of removals in carbon accounting. I show here how the concept of compartmental system provides the level of generality needed to address the temporal nature of removals in carbon accounting, with clearly defined metrics for assessing climate benefits of temporary storage. I also show how the variable time can be incorporated in the definitions of carbon sequestration and removals in a way that would encourage the development of climate actions that would keep carbon out of the atmosphere for long periods of time. In contrast to traditional 'stock change' or 'tonne-year' accounting methods, the approach proposed here takes explicit consideration of the time that carbon remains stored in a natural system and does not contribute to warming in the atmosphere. The proposed methodology may resolve current issues related to the definition of baselines, permanence and quantification of temporary storage and reversals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.