ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
Patellar Tendinopathy Responding to Spinal Treatment: A Case Report Using Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patellar tendinopathy is a common condition among athletes. While treatment typically focuses on strengthening exercises for knee extensors, the underlying origin of knee pain often remains unclear. This case report aims to illustrate the clinical reasoning process for a patient referred to physical therapy for patellar tendinopathy using the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) system assessment. Case description: A 45-year-old patient engaged in a marathon preparation was diagnosed with chronic patellar tendinopathy. He reported experiencing pain during long-distance runs and interval training, as well as during functional tests. Treatment involved only repeated lumbar movement exercises, which elicited changes in knee pain and functional limitations. Outcomes: Numeric pain rating scores and the Victoria Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire were used to assess changes in pain, function, and sport limitations. NPRS decreased from 4/10 at rest after sport and 7/10 during activities to 0/10 in both scenarios. Meanwhile, disability scores improved from 57/100 to 99/100 after three weeks of follow-up and reached 100 at six months. Conclusion: The results of this case report emphasize the importance of assessing the spine in knee disorders. Through a comprehensive examination, chronic tendon pain can be effectively addressed. The MDT system was effective in distinguishing between spinal and knee-related symptoms in this marathon runner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.