ArticleJCA Advances2025
Implementation Mapping to Guide Adoption of a Semi-Structured Intraoperative Anesthesia Handoff Tool.
Article in JCA Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There frequently exists a gap between known best practices and real-world methods. Closing this gap involves thoughtful implementation, typically involving multiple implementation strategies. Implementation mapping is a technique that links the innovation being implemented with potential barriers to implementation and connects these barriers to the strategies that form the implementation plan. This study demonstrates the application of implementation mapping to guide the adoption of the Epic Health Systems Intraoperative Anesthesia Handoff Report. The objective is to create a comprehensive implementation plan tailored to the anticipated challenges of the local environment. There are five steps in implementation mapping: (1) performing a needs assessment, (2) creating a matrix of change, (3) identifying the mechanisms of change and strategies for change, (4) creating implementation materials, and (5) measuring implementation outcomes. Through the creation of this map, a multi-pronged implementation strategy was created and executed. This implementation plan resulted in high acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores among frontline anesthesia clinicians adopting the intraoperative anesthesia tool. The logical connections between the barriers and the implementation strategies further facilitated changes to the implementation plan as new challenges arose during the implementation process. This study addresses a critical gap in clinical practice by providing a structured approach to implementing best practices in anesthesiology. Implementation mapping can potentially be a valuable technique for guiding quality improvement projects involving implementing new clinical practices in anesthesiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.