Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469621›Full record

ArticleJCA Advances2025

Implementation Mapping to Guide Adoption of a Semi-Structured Intraoperative Anesthesia Handoff Tool.

Aubrey Samost-Williams, Reed Richter, Naveen Vanga, Spandana Mandaloju, Adlai Arandela, Srikanth Sridhar, Eric J Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCA Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aubrey Samost-WilliamsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Reed RichterMcGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Naveen VangaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Spandana MandalojuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Adlai ArandelaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Srikanth SridharDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Eric J ThomasDepartment of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonK12TR004908 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Charles C Miller, JON E. TYSON · 2024 to 2026
$2.9M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There frequently exists a gap between known best practices and real-world methods. Closing this gap involves thoughtful implementation, typically involving multiple implementation strategies. Implementation mapping is a technique that links the innovation being implemented with potential barriers to implementation and connects these barriers to the strategies that form the implementation plan. This study demonstrates the application of implementation mapping to guide the adoption of the Epic Health Systems Intraoperative Anesthesia Handoff Report. The objective is to create a comprehensive implementation plan tailored to the anticipated challenges of the local environment. There are five steps in implementation mapping: (1) performing a needs assessment, (2) creating a matrix of change, (3) identifying the mechanisms of change and strategies for change, (4) creating implementation materials, and (5) measuring implementation outcomes. Through the creation of this map, a multi-pronged implementation strategy was created and executed. This implementation plan resulted in high acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores among frontline anesthesia clinicians adopting the intraoperative anesthesia tool. The logical connections between the barriers and the implementation strategies further facilitated changes to the implementation plan as new challenges arose during the implementation process. This study addresses a critical gap in clinical practice by providing a structured approach to implementing best practices in anesthesiology. Implementation mapping can potentially be a valuable technique for guiding quality improvement projects involving implementing new clinical practices in anesthesiology.

Indexed as

implementation mappingimplementation scienceintraoperative handoffs

Identifiers

PMID40469621
PMCPMC12136501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.