ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
First assessment of the health status of pregnant women, detection of prevalence and risk factors associated with enzootic ovine abortion disease among pregnant women in southern Benin.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to access for the first time in the Benin Republic, the characteristics of the health status and the serological prevalence of Methods: About six municipalities under two governorates were concerned and around 420 pregnant women were enrolled for the survey (210 participants in each governorate). Among of this enrollment, 385 participants were concerned for serological test. Results: Our result showed that this survey among pregnant women at the Sakété-Ifangni health zone hospital revealed that 125 participants (59.52%) had been exposed to potentially infected animals or products, with 40% having touched items from sick animals. Overall, 65.24% of animal owners were unsure whether they had been exposed. As much as 28 to 38% of the women farmed alongside their husbands, which frequently led to direct contact with aborted products. The consumption of milk from small ruminants was 26.67%. This consumption was associated with the risk of Conclusion: This data constitutes an epidemiology alert, justifying the introduction of additional methods such as PCR to access the active circulation and refine prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.