Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469576›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Surgical transitional care interventions and their outcomes: a scoping review.

G Tobiano, W Chaboyer, K Turner, A M Eskes, B Patel, J Colquhoun, L Ferronato, B M Gillespie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G TobianoNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD Australia 4222.
W ChaboyerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD Australia 4222.
K TurnerGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital & Health Service, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
A M EskesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD Australia 4222.
B PatelGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital & Health Service, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
J ColquhounGriffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
L FerronatoGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital & Health Service, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
B M GillespieNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD Australia 4222.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The few reviews available on surgical transitional care interventions focus on intervention effectiveness on readmissions, showing that transitional care interventions may reduce readmissions. More detailed guidance is needed for clinicians and researchers to adapt and implement these interventions and evaluate their effect. Objective: To identify, synthesise and map the evidence on surgical transitional care intervention components and surgical patient outcomes. Design: Scoping review. Methods: Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched, followed by backward and forward citation searching. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstracts, and then full-texts. Data were extracted about study and intervention characteristics by one researcher, and checked for accuracy by a second researcher. To summarise the data, intervention components and outcome measures were categorised according to an existing list of transitional care intervention components and a core outcome set for perioperative patients, which were presented as tables, figures, and text. Results: Of 5176 articles found, 30 studies were included. Most studies focussed on cardiothoracic, general and orthopaedic surgery, and were primarily conducted in Asia and North America. Outcomes frequently measured were hospital readmissions, followed by health-related quality of life. Pre-discharge assessment, education and discharge planning, post-discharge telephone calls, and caregiver involvement were the most common intervention components. Generally, they demonstrated positive outcomes for hospital readmission and patient satisfaction. Conclusions: There is large focus on re-admission as an outcome measure, presenting an opportunity to explore a broader range of patient-centred and transition specific outcome measures. While common transitional care intervention components were uncovered, the evidence-base for each individual component is unclear. Gaps were found in surgical populations and settings, with most transitional care interventions focussing on cardiothoracic surgery across a limited geographic context, highlighting the opportunity to build the evidence-base for surgical transitional care interventions across a range of contexts. Review registration: The Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kf2v7/).

Indexed as

Continuity of patient careHospital to home transitionOperativePatient dischargePostoperative careReviewSurgical proceduresTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID40469576
PMCPMC12136900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.