Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469561›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025

Organisational support for employees with dyslexia: An explorative study in South Africa.

Carmen Venter, Lizelle Rossouw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carmen VenterWorkWell Research Unit, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-465X
Lizelle RossouwWorkWell Research Unit, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-0523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dyslexia is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects reading, writing and spelling. While it is often identified and accommodated in educational settings, employees with dyslexia (EWD) may still face challenges in the workplace as they continue to struggle with this disability throughout their adult lives. While dyslexia can pose challenges for adults in the workplace, accommodations and support measures are available to help mitigate these difficulties. Objectives: This study explored the nature of organisational support provided to EWD within South African organisations. Method: This qualitative research study adopted a constructivist paradigm and applied a qualitative descriptive research strategy. The research approach involved conducting 15 ( Results: Employees with dyslexia identified challenges related to dyslexia. Some reported efficient organisational support, while others felt it was lacking. Many used adaptive strategies to cope with daily difficulties. Recommendations were made to improve support for EWD. Conclusion: Employees with dyslexia's experiences can inform the development of inclusive policies and practices supporting these individuals. Moreover, EWD highlighted the importance of raising awareness and promoting a culture of inclusivity and support for dyslexia within South African organisations. Contribution: The study contributes to the literature on dyslexia and the workforce regarding organisational support within a South African context and has captured the need to encourage heightened awareness, empathy and equitable practices within organisations.

Indexed as

adult with dyslexiadyslexiaemployee with dyslexiaorganisational supportSouth African organisationsspecific learning disability

Identifiers

PMID40469561
PMCPMC12135158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.