ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Computer-based Simulation of Facial Flap and Cleft Lip Reconstruction Using Multiresolution Physics.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The State of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in 2025-2026: Current Challenges, Pressures, and the Path Forward.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Surgical management and postoperative strategies - A researcher's perspective.Oncoscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-based simulation of complex local flap reconstructions of the face requires very high-density finite elements to render accurately due to the intricate incision designs frequently used. This is particularly true in detailed cleft lip/nose repairs. If the entire anatomic model is embedded in a high-resolution solid lattice, the element count becomes so high that simulator performance is very slow, even on a high-performance workstation. This article introduces a simulator in which the model is initially presented at a low, but acceptable physical resolution. As the surgeon operates on the model, only the areas impacted are recut at very high resolution. This surgical subvolume is then merged back into the rest of the model. The dramatic reduction in finite element count results in a surgical simulation program that is quite fast, even on a modest personal computer. This article presents examples of this simulator used in a variety of facial flap and cleft lip reconstructions. Future uses in plastic surgery for patient-specific simulation, education, and illustration are discussed. The simulator is available as free, open-source software.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.