Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469540›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Occupational exposure and human carriage of

Matheus de O Costa, Richard Rusk, LeeAnn Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matheus de O CostaLarge Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Richard RuskDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
LeeAnn PetersMaple Leaf Foods Incorporated, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Over 3 years two different, both naïve, independent swine farms experienced outbreaks of Findings: Environmental samples and non-human carriers tested negative throughout outbreaks. Isolates recovered from pigs in all outbreaks from site A and site B had >99.9 % average nucleotide identity. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that all isolates are related. Patient 1, who transited between site A and B immediately before site B experienced their first swine case, was present in site A after removal off all pigs and before each outbreak. They also shed Interpretation: A human carrier of Funding: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada. Saskatchewan Agriculture Ministry, Canada. Results Driven Agriculture Research, Canada.

Indexed as

AmphixenosisAsymptomaticEpidemiologyHumanInfectionOutbreakPigStreptococcusSubclinicalSwineZooepidemicusZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40469540
PMCPMC12135373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.