Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469499›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Exploring the resilience skills and strategies of social workers.

Lucy R Mangolele, Taetske M Calitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucy R MangoleleDepartment of Social Work, School of Social Sciences, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7531-3783
Taetske M CalitzDepartment of Social Work, School of Social Sciences, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-4572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research shows that social workers face numerous challenges because of the demanding nature of their profession, necessitating the development of resilience skills and techniques. Social workers assist marginalised populations and operate in challenging environments, requiring strong resilience strategies. Aim: This article examines the resilience skills and strategies of social workers. Setting: The study setting comprised the Department of Social Development in Johannesburg Metro Region. Methods: The study employs a qualitative approach, utilising purposive sampling to identify participants for semi-structured interviews. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with the social workers, and data were analysed using Creswell and Poth's qualitative thematic analysis strategy. A total of 13 participants were interviewed. Results: Three main themes emerged: Theme 1: Resilience skills and strategies employed by social workers to surmount challenges; theme 2: Effectiveness of resilience skills and strategies employed by social workers; and theme 3: Social workers' suggestions on what the department can do to maintain their resilience. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that resilience skills and strategies are crucial for social workers, enabling them to cope effectively with work-related challenges and find meaning in their work. Contribution: This study will assist social workers to understand the skills and strategies that underpin their resilience. It will also assist the Department of Social Development and other public sectors in developing support programmes to retain social workers for the profession.

Indexed as

burnoutexperiencesqualitative researchresilienceskillsocial workerstrategiesstress

Identifiers

PMID40469499
PMCPMC12135163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.