Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469492›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Women's experiences of high-risk pregnancy care in resource constrained Cape Town communities.

Gugulethu Cebekhulu, Michelle G Andipatin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gugulethu CebekhuluDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-4432
Michelle G AndipatinDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-9361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 'high-risk' classification during pregnancy leads to constant monitoring and frequent interactions with healthcare professionals, making it crucial for healthcare providers to show compassion. Aim: The study aimed to describe how women diagnosed with a high-risk pregnancy experienced their pregnancies as well as their interactions with the government healthcare system in Cape Town. Setting: The study was carried out using the Zoom digital platform and telephone. Participants lived in Cape Town neighbourhoods that are traditionally referred to as townships. Methods: A qualitative exploratory research design was used in the study. Nine women over 18 years old, diagnosed as having had a high-risk pregnancy and had given birth within 2 years were purposively selected. Open-ended questions were utilised, and data were interpreted using a thematic analysis. Results: Four main themes with 10 sub-themes emerged. The main themes included: 'Being labelled as high-risk', 'locus of control', 'fear' and 'hospitalisation'. Conclusion: The study revealed that the psychological requirements of women diagnosed with high-risk pregnancy are not always met by the healthcare system. Fear experienced by women emerged from the high-risk label itself, and the amplification of the risk status by clinicians. Contribution: Through the lens of expectant mothers utilising government healthcare services in Cape Town, the study gives insight into pregnant women's experiences. This insight provides opportunities for healthcare providers to re-consider and incorporate some interventions that could assist women.

Indexed as

government healthcare serviceshigh-risk pregnancyqualitativequality of careresource-constrainedSouth Africasubjective experiencesWestern Cape

Identifiers

PMID40469492
PMCPMC12135107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.