ReviewEplasty2025
Augmenting the Breast Reconstruction: Core Projection With Hybrid Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Flap and Stacked Prepectoral Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Review in Eplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The hybrid implant-flap breast reconstruction-pearls and pitfalls: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients who require breast reconstruction prefer a flap-based approach for various reasons, including the permanence and aesthetic benefit of a breast that looks and feels natural. For patients who desire autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy but lack adequate donor site volume, the authors utilize the novel hybrid flap, prepectoral acellular dermal matrix (HyPAD) approach. In this technique, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is augmented with a stacked acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The purpose of this study is to quantify the soft tissue augmentation and core projection achieved with this technique during autologous flap-based breast reconstruction. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent the HyPAD technique during the study period (August 2021 to December 2022) were identified. All patients lacked adequate donor site volume and wished to avoid the placement of implants during their reconstruction. Demographic information and outcomes were assessed. Intraoperatively, the weights (g) of the mastectomy specimen, the flap donor site, and the stacked ADM were recorded. Results: During the study period, 21 patients (n = 21) were identified. The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 48.9 ± 7.85 years. The mean body mass index was 24.1 kg/m Conclusions: The use of ADM during autologous breast reconstruction provides patients with an alternative to implants that allows them to obtain their desired breast volume. Given the aesthetic impact that ADM has on the total amount of flap weight and projection, it is recommended that the HyPAD technique be considered for patients who desire a breast that cannot be restored with their own flap weight and wish to avoid implants.
Identifiers
40469487PMC12132684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.