ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025
A life cycle risk assessment of nanopesticides in freshwater.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupling bioaccumulation and trophic transfer: nanoatrazine accumulates in microalgae but shows limited transfer to zooplankton.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Review
- Nanopesticides by Design: A Review of Delivery Platforms, Environmental Fate, and Standards for Safe and Sustainable Crop Protection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Nature to Nanotech: Customizing Essential Oil Delivery for a Reduced Fungicide in Agriculture.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Spatial spillovers and nonlinear drivers of water-supply carbon emissions in China.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional ecological risk assessments prioritize downstream anthropogenic impacts, overlooking risks arising from upstream processes involving highly hazardous substances and indirect emissions. This narrow focus obscures high-risk hotspots and renders traditional methodologies ill-suited for evaluating novel chemical entities. Nanopesticides, designed for targeted delivery of pesticidal active ingredients, are increasingly deployed to enhance efficiency, yet their altered environmental fate and transport dynamics may reshape end-of-life risks while their full lifecycle impacts remain uncharacterized. Here, we address this gap using imidacloprid (IMI) and its nano-encapsulated variant (nano-IMI) as case studies. By applying life cycle assessment and integrating the USEtox ecotoxicity model with the nano-specific SimpleBox4Nano framework, we quantify "cradle-to-gate" environmental impacts and derive substance-specific ecotoxicity metrics, enabling systematic characterization of end-of-life risks associated with these formulations. Production-stage ecological risks of nano-IMI (4.63 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.