ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Compensatory Movements of the Midfoot Joints Influence Gait Pattern After Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) is a standard procedure for end-stage osteoarthritis of the ankle. One of the main concerns after AAA remains the development of secondary osteoarthritis in the subtalar and tarsal joints in the long term. This development is thought to be due to a compensatory increased mobility and therefore increased load on the adjacent joints. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the residual motion of the tarsal joints, the load distribution under the foot, and the influence of tarsal joint motion on load distribution and gait pattern after AAA. Methods: 29 patients with arthroscopic AAA were analyzed in a retrospective case-control series by pedobarographic gait analysis and fluoroscopy. The variables examined by pedobarography included peak force, peak pressure, and contact time of 10 different zones of the foot during the roll-over process, comparing the operated with the contralateral healthy foot. The range of motion (ROM) of the subtalar and medial tarsal joints in dorsiflexion/plantarflexion were assessed radiologically. Results: After AAA, peak forces of the ipsilateral foot were significantly reduced for the entire foot and especially the first metatarsal, great toe, and lesser toes during the roll-over process. Peak pressure decreased significantly under the lesser toes and increased under metatarsal 5, without significant load alterations under the mid- and hindfoot. The residual ROM of the subtalar and tarsal joints in dorsiflexion/plantarflexion was 23.5 degrees. The greater the ROM of the adjacent joints, the more the gait pattern normalized. Conclusion: Load distribution during the stance phase is influenced by AAA; the ROM of the subtalar and midfoot joints is essential in normalizing gait pattern. Level of Evidence: IV, case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.