Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469467›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Habitat and Anthropogenic Determinants of Chinese Pangolin (

Bishal Bhandari, Bijaya Dhami, Nishan Kc, Prakash Mahatara, Asmit Neupane, Shushma Gosai, Anush Udaya, Nikita Phuyal, Pramod Ghimire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bishal BhandariCollege of Natural Resource Management Agriculture and Forestry University Udayapur Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8219-7443
Bijaya DhamiDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-138X
Nishan KcWWF Nepal Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-9594
Prakash MahataraCollege of Natural Resource Management Agriculture and Forestry University Udayapur Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0769-8486
Asmit NeupaneInstitute of Forestry Pokhara Campus Tribhuwan University Pokhara Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-4551
Shushma GosaiCollege of Natural Resource Management Agriculture and Forestry University Udayapur Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5469-7888
Anush UdayaInstitute of Forestry Pokhara Campus Tribhuwan University Pokhara Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9619-7079
Nikita PhuyalSchool of Forestry and Natural Resource Management, Institute of Forestry Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-3478
Pramod GhimireFaculty of Forestry Agriculture and Forestry University Hetauda Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-8844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese pangolins are found from lowlands to mid-hills in Nepal and are increasingly vulnerable to extinction due to extensive illegal trade and habitat fragmentation, particularly outside the protected areas network. The information about their ecological preferences in human-dominated landscapes beyond protected areas is essential for effective habitat management and conservation. This study aimed to assess the density and characteristics of Chinese pangolin burrows, and analyze the key ecological and anthropogenic factors influencing their burrow occurrence in Katari municipality, Udayapur District, Eastern Nepal. We employed a total of 52 strip transects, each of 500 m long and 20 m wide, divided into two 250-m sections on either side of the main transect and spaced 200 m apart to examine the pangolin burrows. We recorded a total of 124 active burrows and 114 inactive burrows, with a density of 2.38 active burrows per hectare. A higher number of burrows (80.25%) were recorded in the forest habitat, suggesting a discrepancy in burrow distribution across the study area. The majority of the burrows were distributed at 601-800 m above sea level (33.61%), 35°-45° slope (53.78%), and 0%-25% canopy cover (52.94%). The Welch Two-Sample

Indexed as

anthropogenic disturbancecanopy coverdistributionelevationgeneralized linear mixed model

Identifiers

PMID40469467
PMCPMC12134491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.