ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Surrogate endpoints in diabetic kidney disease: current perspectives and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a leading complication of diabetes, frequently progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which significantly impairs patients' quality of life and imposes substantial healthcare burdens. Consequently, early detection and intervention in DKD are paramount. The incorporation of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials has emerged as a pivotal strategy for assessing the efficacy of novel therapies, facilitating the reduction of trial duration and associated costs. Currently, the rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin excretion, either independently or in combination, serve as reliable surrogate endpoints for evaluating DKD progression. Although novel biomarkers such as KIM-1 and TNFR2 are not yet recommended as standalone surrogate endpoints for DKD, they hold potential when used in combination with established markers, such as eGFR slope and urinary albumin change rate, to improve the prediction of ESRD risk. While omics-based indicators demonstrate promise in DKD research, their utility requires further validation, particularly through long-term follow-up and dynamic monitoring, to establish their effectiveness and clinical applicability. Future research should prioritize the validation and optimization of potential surrogate endpoints through long-term follow-up studies and large-scale cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.