Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469396›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025

Respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis for children in Africa: Challenges, opportunities and public health strategies.

Phillip T Chigiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Phillip T ChigiyaDepartment of Public Health, Dawa Health Clinic, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3288-8062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in young children, accounting for an estimated 94 600 to 149 400 deaths annually and over 33 million cases of LRTI. The burden is particularly acute in Africa, where limited healthcare access, malnutrition, and co-infections exacerbate outcomes. Despite the introduction of maternal vaccines, such as RSVpreF (respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as nirsevimab, barriers including high costs, infrastructure limitations, and vaccine hesitancy hinder implementation in African settings. This article examines the challenges of RSV prophylaxis in Africa, including the economic burden of interventions, cold chain requirements, and the scarcity of robust epidemiological and surveillance data. It highlights the need for expanded molecular surveillance and localised clinical trials to ensure the safety and efficacy of these interventions. Vaccine hesitancy, rooted in historical failures such as the formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine, underscores the importance of culturally sensitive community engagement. Opportunities for advancing RSV prevention in Africa include integrating maternal vaccines into antenatal care systems, aligning vaccination schedules with RSV seasonality, and leveraging private sector partnerships. Advocacy for WHO prequalification is essential to enable global procurement and secure international funding. A dual approach combining maternal vaccines with mAbs offers comprehensive protection, particularly for high-risk infants. By addressing these challenges and leveraging available opportunities, Africa can lead efforts to reduce RSV-associated morbidity and mortality, improving outcomes for its most vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Africamaternal vaccinationmonoclonal antibodiespublic healthrespiratory syncytial virussurveillancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40469396
PMCPMC12135121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.