ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Contrast-induced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following diagnostic angiography of vertebral artery.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is characterized by transient vasogenic edema, predominantly affecting the white matter in the posterior cerebral hemispheres. It presents with acute neurological symptoms such as headaches, visual disturbances, and seizures. The pathophysiology of PRES, including its overlap with contrast-induced encephalopathy and transient cortical blindness, remains unclear. Case Description: A 76-year-old woman with a basilar artery aneurysm underwent diagnostic angiography. During the procedure, she experienced a hypertensive spike following the injection of contrast medium. Four hours post-angiography, she developed disorientation and bilateral light perception, which progressed to complete blindness. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral occipital hemisphere edema, confirming a diagnosis of PRES. All neurological symptoms resolved within 48 h. Subsequently, she successfully underwent coil embolization of the aneurysm. With careful blood pressure management and a switch to a different type of contrast medium, PRES did not recur despite the use of a larger volume of contrast medium. Conclusion: This case of contrast-induced PRES underscores the potential overlap in pathogenesis between PRES and contrast-induced encephalopathy. It emphasizes the need for careful blood pressure management and consideration of contrast medium type in patients undergoing angiography, especially those with a history of PRES. The successful management of this case provides valuable insights into the prevention and treatment of PRES in similar clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.