ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Thoracic outlet syndrome associated with cervicothoracic scoliosis.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a debilitating neurologic condition that is commonly encountered in routine neurosurgical practice. It causes severe pain, paresthesias, and weakness in the affected limb and can negatively impact patients' quality of life. Classically, TOS is caused by compression of the neurovascular bundle in the thoracic outlet region, often by soft tissue or bony anomalies. A relationship to cervicothoracic scoliosis has not been previously reported. The purpose of this case series is to report on the clinical and radiographic findings, surgical interventions, and clinical outcomes in patients with TOS and concurrent cervicothoracic scoliosis. We hypothesize that the abnormal cervicothoracic curvature may contribute to compression within the thoracic outlet. Methods: Patients who presented to the senior author's clinic and had both cervicothoracic scoliosis and TOS were identified, and a retrospective chart review was performed. A review of the electronic medical records was used to collect clinical information and outcomes data. The study is a retrospective case series of patients who presented to the senior author's clinic and underwent surgical intervention by the senior author at a university hospital. Ten patients were identified as having symptoms consistent with TOS and were also found to have coexisting cervicothoracic scoliosis. We report on the preoperative physiology measures, such as imaging and electrodiagnostic findings, and postoperative self-reported symptoms and functional measures. Results: Ten patients who presented to the clinic for evaluation of symptoms consistent with TOS were also noted to have mild-to-moderate cervicothoracic scoliosis. Eight of these patients underwent surgical intervention for their TOS, including anterior scalenectomy, pectoralis minor release, first rib resection, or a combination of the three procedures. Four patients underwent bilateral procedures. At 3 months, all patients (100%) had improvement in their numeric rating scale, and at 1 year, this dropped to 83%. Conclusion: It is well-known that bony abnormalities, such as the presence of a cervical rib or elongated C7 transverse process, can lead to the development of TOS; however, a relationship to scoliosis, which similarly may deform the thoracic outlet region has not been reported. The relationship between these two conditions merits ongoing clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.