Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Pretreatment CALLY index as promising novel biomarker in the prediction of surgical and oncological outcomes in esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Peize Meng, Tongtong Gu, Jiayong Xu, Haihua Huang, Hansong Jin, Yuchen Wang, Hang Zhang, Zheng Ruan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peize Meng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tongtong Gu *Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiayong Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haihua HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hansong JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuchen WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hang ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zheng RuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a global health challenge with high mortality rates. The traditional TNM staging system is limited in its ability to provide accurate prognostic predictions. This study aimed to investigate the utility of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in the evaluation of mid- to long-term outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of 657 EC patients admitted between 2010 to 2024, with 553 patients from Shanghai General Hospital (training cohort) and 104 from Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (validation cohort). Associations between the CALLY and overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses. Results: Patients with CALLY index > 2.55 were associated with significantly improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.71) and DFS (HR: 0.51, 0.40-0.65), independent of clinical risk factors. Incorporating CALLY index into clinical prediction models significantly enhanced discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] of OS: 0.719-0.752; AUROC of DFS: 0.745-0.788, P < 0.01). In the validation cohort, the same associations were also observed (HR of OS: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78; HR of DFS: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). In both cohorts, CALLY index > 2.55 were associated with significantly reduced risk of recurrence. Conclusions: The CALLY index emerges as a cost-effective prognostic tool integrating inflammation-nutrition-immunity parameters. Its preoperative integration with tumor, node, and metastasis staging and other well-known risk factors might optimize risk stratification and guide personalized therapeutic strategies for EC patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinEsophageal NeoplasmsLymphocytesAgedEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinC-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte indexdisease-free survivalesophageal cancerneoadjuvant therapyoverall survivalsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40469280
PMCPMC12133803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.