ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2025
Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Cognitive Screening Battery: Indonesian version.
Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping dementia research in Indonesia: A scoping review of evidence, gaps, and future directions.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia is a significant public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Indonesia, where underdiagnosis is common. Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Brief Cognitive Screening Battery - Indonesian Version (BCSB-INA), a culturally-adapted tool aimed at improving the early detection of dementia. Methods: The tool was tested on a sample of 140 older adults, covering various cognitive domains through multiple subscales. Data were analyzed using bootstrap resampling, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and reliability assessments such as Cronbach's Alpha. Results: The overall reliability, measured by Cronbach's Alpha, was high (α=0.968). The KMO test yielded a value of 0.889, indicating sample adequacy for factor analysis. The CFA indicated that most dimensions achieved satisfactory validity, with the majority of items demonstrating acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: BCSB-INA has demonstrated good reliability and validity throughout its dimensions, suggesting its applicability for use in cognitive assessments in the Indonesian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.