Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40469224›Full record

ArticleHealth behavior research2023

The Cigarillo Purchase Task: A Qualitative Analysis.

Amanda J Quisenberry, Sarah Koopman-Gonzalez, Elizabeth G Klein, Erika Trapl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health behavior research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda J QuisenberryRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Sarah Koopman-GonzalezCase Western Reserve University.
Elizabeth G KleinOhio State University - Main Campus.
Erika TraplCase Western Reserve University.

Funding

Impact of Flavor on Youth & Young Adults use Intention, Abuse Liability and Perceptions of CigarillosR01DA048529 · NIDA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, ELIZABETH G, QUISENBERRY, AMANDA J · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cigarillo purchase task is a novel procedure modeled after the cigarette purchase task. This procedure can be used to assess the reinforcing value or the positive behavioral response to cigarillo products. Little research has used the cigarillo purchase task and the aim of the current study was to evaluate users' understanding of and thoughts about a cigarillo purchase task. A convenience sample of young adults ages 21-28 were recruited online to participate in semi-structured interviews about cigarillo and e-cigarette use. The analysis included responses from participants who were current users of cigarillos (n = 7) or cigarillos and e-cigarettes (n = 8). Audio-recorded interviews conducted remotely were coded by two researchers and thematic analysis was implemented. Emergent themes were related to purchasing price, budget, normal cigarillo usage, cigarillo pack size, and timeframe of use. Increased use was mentioned when products were free. When cigarillos were expensive, others introduced strategies to circumvent the 24-hour purchase period of the task. Comments also were made that budget is important and using a calculator during the task is helpful. Finally, some participants commented that selling in individual units was not realistic and made it more difficult to purchase. Results suggest modifications to the task, including depiction of cigarillo pack size and use of a budget calculator. These enhancements support usability and replicability of results when implementing this purchase task in health behavior and tobacco control research.

Indexed as

cigarillocigarillo purchase taskcigarillose-cigaretteshealth behaviorpurchase taskqualitativetobacco control

Identifiers

PMID40469224
PMCPMC12136497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.