Cross-reactivity and sensitization profiles of cockroach and moth allergens provide new insights in cockroach-allergic patients.

Jiale Zhang, Aoli Li, Li Liu, Bo Chang, Wenting Luo, Baoqing Sun

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiale ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Aoli LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Li LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Bo ChangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Wenting LuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Baoqing SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhalant insect allergens are widely implicated as common triggers of respiratory allergies, but little is known about cross-reactivity between cockroaches and other insect allergens. This study mainly investigates sensitization profiles and cross-reactivity between cockroach allergens and moth allergens to provide insights into the clinical management of cockroach-allergic patients. Methods: A total of 386 suspected cockroach-sensitized patients were enrolled. Sensitization rates were determined using IgE testing for common airborne allergens. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using IgE inhibition assays, immunoblotting, and basophil activation tests. Age-related sensitization patterns were analyzed to assess variability in immune response across different demographics. Results: A high frequency of silk moth was observed in cockroach-sensitized patients, with sensitization rates to German cockroach and silk moth allergens at 81.09% and 81.61%, respectively, and a high co-sensitization rate (54.66%). Age analysis revealed similar peak sensitization of German cockroach and silk moth in school-age children and young adults, with a lower prevalence in the elderly. Additionally, cockroach crude extract can inhibit the IgE-binding of cockroach-sensitized patients' sera and silk moth crude extract, while various moths can activate basophils as well. Conclusions: This study highlights the similar age-related sensitization patterns between German cockroach and silk moth, differing from those observed with house dust mites. Besides, cross-reactivity between different cockroach and moth allergens was confirmed through significant IgE inhibition, multiple sequences alignment of shared epitopes and basophil activation tests. These findings highlight the need to consider cross-reactivity between cockroach and moth allergens in clinical evaluations.

Indexed as

Blattella germanica (German cockroach)Cockroach allergyCross-reactivityInsect allergenSilk moth

Identifiers

PMID40469215

DOI10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101057

PMCPMC12133693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.