SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Analysis of prognostic factors and risk prediction in brain metastases: a SEER population-based study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA profiling in central nervous system metastases from solid tumors: A prospective multicentre translational analysis of the BrainStorm (OncoDistinct-006) study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Pan-immune-inflammation value as an independent prognostic marker in patients with brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigates survival disparities and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases originating from various primary cancers to facilitate risk stratification and enhance precision in diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Patients diagnosed with brain metastases between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the SEER database for analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, complemented by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The impact of age on the risk and survival of brain metastases was examined using Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS) in Cox regression models. Results: A total of 55,094 patients diagnosed with brain metastases between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified from the SEER database for inclusion in this study. It was found that the median survival times were 2 months (95% CI: 2-3 months) for liver cancer, 3 months (95% CI: 3-4 months) for stomach cancer, and 5 months (95% CI: 4-5 months) for lung cancer. Survival was influenced by factors such as sex, age, primary cancer site, race, income, marital status, and treatment approaches. Surgical treatment notably decreased the mortality risk, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 (95% CI: 4-5 months) for lung cancer, 0.43 (95% CI:3-4 months) for kidney cancer, and 0.63 (95% CI: 5-7 months) for breast cancer. The predictive model created with these variables achieved a C-index of 0.723 and 0.722 in the training and test sets, respectively, indicating vital accuracy. Calibration curves displayed minimal errors, and the area under the curve (AUC) values showed excellent performance at 3 months (training: 0.83, test: 0.83), 6 months (training: 0.80, test: 0.80), and 12 months (training: 0.77, test: 0.76). Conclusion: Brain metastases from liver, stomach, and lung cancers are linked to a poor prognosis. Surgical intervention significantly lowers mortality risk. The predictive model, which incorporates vital survival factors, demonstrates high accuracy and reliable performance, supporting the clinical management of patients with brain metastases. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD420251054176.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.