ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
A programme of faculty development in medical education for junior doctors: The start of a journey to clinical educator.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Interest in medical education for early career doctors is on the rise, but medical education training is insufficient. Medical education faculty development programmes for Junior/Foundation year doctors (JDs) are needed. Methods: A group of clinical educators designed a development programme and interested Junior doctors were recruited to a pilot. A pre-programme questionnaire established teaching practices and needs of JDs. It had two parts. First included a full day of hands-on workshop, imparting educational principles, teaching skills, developing a lesson plan and practicing structured feedback. The second part invited them to deliver faculty observed skills sessions to medical students, with feedback. Faculty reflection and peer review informed evaluation of the course. Results: Twelve JDs were recruited, with nine attending (75% retention). Eight completed pre-course questionnaire (89%, n=8/9). This showed frequent bedside teaching (87%, n=7/8), confidence (75%, n=6/8) but 'not often' satisfaction with their teaching (75%, n=6/8). JDs' engagement with post-course evaluation was low (25%). Faculty reflection was a positive approach and generated ideas for improvement. Conclusions: JDs had high levels of engagement with students, but confidence did not translate into satisfaction, with knowledge and skills gaps. Reflection and peer review provided good insights into the programme and its need. Such programmes are feasible to continue faculty development of JDs, who regularly teach medical students on the wards and can provide clinical educationalist of tomorrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.