ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Reticulospinal modulation of muscle activation and electromechanical coupling: evidence from the StartReact paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males.Experimental brain research · 2026Trial
- Impact of the brainstem in normal and impaired human movement control.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Evidence for Increased High Alpha Intermuscular Coherence as a Measure of Reticulospinal Motor Drive.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Comparison of the reticulospinal drive to lumbar erector spinae muscles in postural and voluntary tasks using the StartReact paradigm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Movement initiation relies on descending motor drive conveying motor commands from the brain to spinal motor circuits, leading to the activation of specific muscles to produce the intended movement. While the role of descending motor drive on the onset of muscle activation has been extensively examined, its impact on motor unit recruitment, muscle fiber activation, and the electromechanical delay (EMD) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to elucidate the role of the reticulospinal (RS) system in shaping muscle activation patterns, movement initiation, and the EMD by employing the StartReact paradigm. Methods: The StartReact paradigm was implemented in 29 healthy participants performing 14 single-joint motor tasks including both upper and lower extremities. Muscle activity was recorded using surface electromyography (EMG), while movement patterns were acquired via motion capture technology. Muscle activation and movement patterns were analyzed in both temporal and amplitude domains to characterize differences between movements cued by either loud (LAS: 120 dB) or moderate acoustic stimuli (MAS: 82 dB). EMD was defined as the time interval between EMG onset and movement initiation. Results: Our results revealed faster and more pronounced muscle activation and movement performance in response to LAS compared to MAS. Notably, EMD was significantly reduced in LAS trials, suggesting that enhanced RS drive facilitates more rapid electromechanical coupling. Discussion: These findings suggest that RS drive not only shortens muscular reaction times - characteristic of the StartReact effect - but also modulates muscle activation and movement dynamics in a way that accelerates the transition from muscle activation to movement. The observed reduction in EMD likely reflects changes in motor unit recruitment and muscle fiber activation, highlighting an additional mechanism through which the RS system enables rapid, explosive motor responses. This study provides novel insights into how descending motor drive modulates muscle activation and movement execution, and emphasizes the relevance of the RS system in supporting rapid, high-force movements essential for protective reflexes and athletic performances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.