ArticleNeurology. Genetics2025
Outcomes in Early-Treated Guanidinoacetate Methyltransferase Deficiency: A Sibling Cohort Study.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GAMT Deficiency: Clinical Presentation, Treatment, Diagnosis, Animal Models, Preclinical and Clinical Developments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency (GAMT-D), a rare inborn error of creatine metabolism, is a disabling neurodevelopmental disorder due to the combined effect of cerebral creatine depletion and guanidinoacetate accumulation. Existing therapies efficiently improve both of the biochemical abnormalities. The goal of this study was to provide evidence for the crucial role of age at treatment initiation in clinical outcomes in affected individuals. Methods: In a mixed-method interview-based and questionnaire-based cohort study, 4 sibling pairs with GAMT-D (case group) and 8 healthy, age-matched sibling pairs (control group) were enrolled. In the case group, each younger sibling was diagnosed and treated earlier than their older sibling. Interviews with parents in the case group were performed to ascertain major perceived differences between the siblings and to construct a questionnaire that was completed by the parents for each child in both groups. Results: In the case group, all younger, earlier treated siblings had distinctly better outcomes in all ascertained domains compared with their older siblings, including development, cognition, school level, motor skills, coordination, adaptive functioning, behavior, needs or supportive measures, and seizures. Remarkably, in the case group, the outcomes in 2 children treated as neonates were not different from the healthy controls; the outcomes in 2 other children treated since infancy were better compared with those treated after the age of 2 years. Discussion: The favorable outcome observed in patients with GAMT-D when treatment is initiated in the presymptomatic period or early infancy should serve as a compelling argument for those programs that have not already implemented newborn screening of GAMT-D.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.