ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025
Association Between Waist-to-Height Ratio Estimated Fat Mass Categories and Incident Fractures.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adiposity Rebound or Fat-Free Mass Anabolism in Children-Challenging a 42-Year-Old BMI Puzzle with Waist-to-Height Ratio: The ASNF-NNF 2025 Inaugural Flemming Quaade Award for Innovation in Childhood Obesity Lecture.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Novel Waist-to-Height Ratio Estimated Fat Mass Pediatric Cut-offs Predict Hypertension Better than Body Mass Index in Multiracial United States Youths and Adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2023 Cycle.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Long-term trends in central obesity in England: an age-period-cohort approach.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Correlations between multiple obesity diagnostic criteria and fracture risk as well as cardiovascular diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Central adiposity and sex influence lipid and glucose indices in Mexican adults: implications for metabolic risk assessment.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough obesity is a well-known risk factor for various metabolic disorders, its impact on fracture risk remains uncertain. The inconsistency in findings may be due to the fact that most studies have relied solely on body mass index (BMI) as the measure of obesity. Other indices, such as waist circumference (WC) and the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), have been suggested as better indicators of obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the association between obesity and fracture risk by using multiple obesity measures, including WHtR, WC and BMI, in a longitudinal cohort.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, we analysed data from 5905 participants in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), with a median follow-up of 16 years. Participants were categorized into tertiles based on WHtR, WC and BMI, and the incidence of overall fractures and site-specific fractures (vertebral, hip and wrist/humerus) was assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between WHtR, WC, BMI and fracture risk, adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsAmong 5905 participants (54% women; age range, 40-69; median age, 50 years; interquartile range, 44-59), 816 fractures were reported over a median follow-up period of 16 years. A one-standard deviation increase in WHtR was associated with a 55% higher risk of overall fractures (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.75), with similar trends observed for vertebral (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.13-2.26), hip (aHR 1.85, 95% CI 1.40-2.43) and wrist/humerus fractures (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.74). A one-unit increase in WC was linked to a 16% higher risk of overall fractures (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.24). BMI was not significantly associated with the fracture risk. Within the same obesity group defined by BMI, participants in the higher WHtR tertiles had a greater incidence of overall fractures. Specifically, individuals in the third tertile of WHtR with a BMI of ≥ 23 to < 25 kg/m
conclusionAlthough a high BMI has often been considered a protective factor against fractures, this study found that obesity, as measured by WHtR, is a risk factor. Even among individuals with a high BMI, those with elevated WHtR should receive additional medical attention to help prevent fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.