Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468792›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025

EDE and EDE-Q: A Call for Field Wide International Collaboration When Revisiting a Classic, Commentary on Reilly et al. (2025).

Paulo P P Machado

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paulo P P MachadoUniversity of Minho, School of Psychology, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-9203

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/PSI/01662/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their 2025 article in the International Journal of Eating Disorders, Reilly, Gorrell, Chapa, Drury, Stalvey, Goldschmidt, and le Grange examine the widespread use of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and its self-report version, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), in assessing eating disorder symptoms. While acknowledging the popularity of these instruments, the authors highlight important limitations-including restricted scope, psychometric shortcomings, and practical challenges such as inconsistent scoring practices and limited applicability across diverse populations. Rather than advocating for the development of entirely new measures, the authors propose building a field-wide consensus to refine existing tools and promote their broader and more consistent use. Reilly et al.'s paper is a timely and valuable contribution to ongoing conversations about assessment practices in the field. In this commentary, we extend their perspective by drawing on previous experiences in the field that support their call to action and suggest that future consensus efforts should built on international experience and collaboration, and ensure that lived experience voices are integral to the process.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersInternational CooperationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesHumansPsychometricsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairescommentaryEDEEDE‐Q

Identifiers

PMID40468792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.