ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Repeat venous sinus stenting for management of recurrent sinus stenosis related treatment failure of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A case series.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus transverse sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Animal Models and Venous Sinus Stenting: Status of Disease and Device-Focused Evidence.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDural venous sinus stenting (VSS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); however over time, some patients develop treatment failure with formation of a juxta-stent stenosis and a new pressure gradient. Repeat stenting can be performed in these patients to alleviate the stenosis and relieve the elevated pressures preventing complications such as blindness. The efficacy and long-term outcomes of re-stenting is not well described in the literature.MethodsA retrospective review of patients treated at our institution for IIH with VSS over a span of 18 years identified 18 patients who underwent re-stenting for treatment failure. Clinical features, outcomes and venographic data were collated for each patient with a follow-up period ranging from 12 months up to 9 years from their second stent.ResultsThe mean time to repeat stenting was 4 years and 12 months with a range of 1 month up to 16 years and 9 months. Four patients (22.2%) were asymptomatic following second stenting and three patients had recurrent papilledema. Two of these patients (11.1%) had surgical shunting and 1 patient (5.56%) received a third stent. 13 patients (72.2%) had ongoing headaches. There were no major complications in any patient.ConclusionsThis case series demonstrates favourable outcomes for repeat VSS in patients who develop juxta-stent stenosis with a pressure gradient after initial stenting for IIH. A proportion of patients have persistent headache likely due to other mechanisms and a minority may require surgical shunting or further stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.